@nite_route
I have removed the promotional SPAM from your profile. Do not restore it; doing so will result in immediate ban.
For readers:
The poster nite_route has 10 solutions and 167 likes over the course of about a month.
Several members have noted the formatting issues with this poster and I have been watching this poster for a while.
Some things stand out:
This poster uses casual speaking styles that are extraordinarily consistent. For example, never capitalizing regular English replies, using "ur" and "u", yet all prompts perfectly case-sensitive. A human being that types so casually is not consistent.
This poster only responds to technical jargon.
This poster has 107 topics viewed against 189 posts.
This poster posts at intervals that are suggestive of a very broken or non existent sleep cycle.
This poster does not acknowledge or respond to private messages.
The formatting is broadly consistent in an abnormal way and refusal to change it or use markdown implies the use of an API, rather than a human operator.
And that brings us to the content: Very confident sounding instructions that are often helpful or correct, but also as often incorrect or highly misleading, matching the pattern of an LLM.
For example, a misuse of the -rm rf flag which could be dangerous if applied incorrectly.
And another instance of unclutter -idle 0 which hides the mouse, but the instructions declare it as "never hides."
There is not enough from these inferences to definitively say that this is an A.I. robot and ban a person. A person can have a largely broken sleep cycle, have years of habit in speech patterns and refuse to deal with a private message.
And with ten solutions accepted, simply banning them now would also remove those accepted solutions.
But enough regular members have noticed oddities that I think a general address is due:
I suspect that nite_route is an A.I. bot.
Take their advise with a bucket of salt. Verify any terminal commands.
@nite_route, this is your chance to speak up. Because currently, you are under review for a ban.
Primarily for advertising a VPN website that is heavy in marketing ploys but implausible claims (VPN's do not work the way the website is trying to sell).