Ah..I am sorry if my choice words were not civil but how does that makes my post an intevention..Wait what is intevension?
What is "wrong" is the information that the post concerned conveyed.
This did not contain any evidence with it and I did search about it after @DeanG mentioned that but I could not find anything of that sort.
Then they also got the meaning of gnome-software "wrong" which also led to confusion with loads of assumptions made by them.
Then they also "wrongly" say that my posts are only concerned with GUI and Eye-candy only whereas, I have not even talked of GUI once and my whole feedback only deals about features.
They call my statement "incorrect" when it isn't and this was already talked about in a different thread. @Aravisian did you fail to spot this?
They wrote this statement inaccurately. They failed to appreciate what the developers of EOS have done to make their distribution by saying that it is filled and prodded with extensions whereas there are no forked extensions if you check their github page or very little if you only guess by looking at the default interface. They failed to notice all the applications that were created by the EOS devs and the effort they put in for that.
This too, if you carefully, could easily mislead any user into thinking that Pop!_OS just like Zorin OS includes extension that were created by others. And just like in the case of EOS they failed to appreciate the work of the devs of Pop!_OS Anyone can detect the inference.
My posts on the other hand:
They keep repeating an obvious fact that they use to assert that all distros have a common base and so all of them are the same.
I as a volunteer and a helpful community member have spent a lot of time helping and debating; putting down my ideas. But I won't stand it when someone else keeps asserting and repeating the same points that I have already addressed.