Well,
The YouTuber YouTux has 24k followers, the video above was seen by 10k in just 3 days. The one I posted 27k views in about 2 months being online. Is he a big fish, I doubt so. There are other ones with more followers who praised Zorin as being good.
Is YouTux right with his accusations? I am not in the position to judge this, being ignorant on the community for many years and just less than a year ago part of it again.
Is he making some valid points? In my opinion, it depends, maybe ... hard to say.
A short search gave me some information about the ZorinGroup. Just not in one place, not on the ZorinOS homepage, a category like About Us might give Zorin a personal touch, a character.
PR does not seem to be their hobby, rather programming. It is a small company of 3-8 persons. I have no idea how the financial situation is, maybe it would be good to hire a PR agent. Taking care of webpage, blog, this forum, social media, the FAQ pages, documentation etc. and other administrative tasks. But such a persons wants to have a decent salary too. Say 2500 âŹ/month, equals 30K per year 60K including taxes. That would be 1200 Zorin Pro purchases. Are you getting my point. Life is not free. People have to pay their rent and buy food to survive.
In this interview from 2023 Artyom Zorin shares a few insights about the project. I like to quote the part on their view about the Zorin Pro version. One that is often criticised by many.
Some people do not like that Zorin OS Ultimate is paid. How do you justify putting a price tag on Linux?
The spirit of Free Software is to create technology that is free as in freedom, not âfree beerâ. This allows developers to charge for their work to make it sustainable. The GNU GPL license actually highlights the fact that Free Software can be paid-for.
Even though many Linux-based projects are available for free, a lot of the development work for Linux is actually done by salaried engineers in large companies like Intel, IBM, and (surprisingly) even Microsoft. These companies contribute these resources to Linux because their servers and products run on it, and by developing Linux theyâre also improving how their businesses run to positively impact their bottom lines. This commercial funding is why we see such a vibrant Open Source community around Linux on servers and IoT.
However, the Linux desktop hasnât seen that level of success yet, as there still hasnât been a strong commercial push into it. When Canonical axed the Unity and Convergence projects earlier this year, they noted that they werenât able to justify funding the development of these projects as they werenât able to produce financial returns to be able to pay for themselves. We believe the lack of commercial focus could risk the stagnation of the development of desktop Linux (case in point above) which would be sad to see. By paying for a Linux desktop distribution, youâre also directly funding the engineers who are developing and making Linux even better on the desktop. In the case of Zorin OS Ultimate, youâre also getting a huge library of additional software and technical support as part of the package, so itâs a win-win for everyone.
I hope they will never ever go for a monthly subscription model, as many smartphone app developers do. I have no problem of buying a version of an OS (as I did for Windows and Office and others) I recently bought a new laptop at Framework. If one orders it with Windows Home they charge you 150 ⏠extra, 260 ⏠for Pro version. I would and will pay for a Linux OS, maybe also a similar price as for MS.