If you are feeling attacked, this must be addressed.
But please remember that Counter-Attacking is just as unproductive.
It is our duty to ensure a fight does not happen; that the forum is a safe place where contributors can feel comfortable to ask questions, express ideas and opinions and discuss differences.
This is very important. Ideas must be tested for Merit and for Validity. Otherwise, how else can we build a working model to understand the world and how to work the world?
In such: clear definitions are necessary. A Personal or Ad Hominem Attack is performed when a person attempts to invalidate an idea by instead, claiming that something else is wrong with the persons. Fictitious example:
"You cannot understand me because you are stubborn!"
The fallacy here in this example is that 'stubbornness' of the other person may well not be the cause of misunderstanding. It attacks their character but does not necessarily address a productive way of understanding. It makes the other person defensive, instead of open.
Making an attack on an Idea, and opinion or an attitude is different. To say that someones words lack merit, that their idea is silly, etc... These are all acceptable because the person is not being attacked, the idea is. And ideas should be vigorously tested. It is how we learn which ideas have merit and are strong and worthwhile and which are not. It is how we learn.
Some of the reasons you expressed above are valid for many of us. And I pointed this out much earlier that it applies to many of us. Singling yourself out does not change this.
However... The context remains important and I will quote you directly:
Here, you state that not buying Zorin Ultimate is reasoned because you cannot Upgrade Ultimate to the Next Release. You repeatedly reinforce this by stating that it will be "obsolete" quickly and by saying that "each new release cannot be bought." Each of these are valid ideas individually. However, taken all together, it becomes: "I would be willing to buy Ultimate Once, if I was able to upgrade that to each successive release without having to pay again." It is accurate to find that kind of Idea to be Entitled.
At this point, you can say that is not what you meant and that would be valid.
But you cannot say that I am motivated or that 2disbetter is motivated to attack you for personal reasons.
These Personal Accusations are no better than Personal Attacks.
They are unproductive and they heavily increase the likelihood of Anger and Fighting.
Because when Both Parties are feeling insulted, then spirited debate has broken down.
Please remember to Step Back from a thread for a moment to gather yourself when you feel the emotion or defensiveness surge. Use that moment to decide the most productive and healthy way to address your disagreements. It is a good habit to have for life and relationships and threads on the net, alike.