Lite vs Core distro-s: my initial comparison

I have them both 17.3 installed on the same HDD (triple boot ).

Resource consumption:

My laptop: Acer Aspire (2012), 2 cores CPU at 2.13Ghz; 4GB RAM, usable 3.8GB

I started each OS with these 4 apps:

  • Brave browser with youtube showing "terminator 2 classic trailer", at 720p
  • their default File Manager app
  • their default Terminal app
  • their default Task Manager App, for measuring

Results:
Zorin Core: RAM ~2.1 GB, Cpu1 ~40-50% , Cpu2 ~40-50%
Zorin Lite : RAM ~1.7 GB, CPU ~35-45%
Note: in Lite, Task Manager showed in Gib so I converted; it only showed a single CPU value, so I assume it's referring to one of the cores.

Starting up:
From login screen: Core: ~15sec, Lite ~10sec
From boot menu: Core: ~1min 40sec, Lite ~1min 15sec

Initial GUI impression

On a first look, Core seems to have a few more GUI settings than Lite:




The looks themselves: for example Settings app, Core, subjectively, looks a bit better; or maybe it's just less loading on the eyes on the first look. However, in Lite, the different colors & bigger size for icons should make them easier to remember and locate later.


To Lite's advantage, I noticed that in Start menu, on right-click of an app you get Edit Application..., or for a pinned app on the task bar - Edit Launcher..., which allows you to do several things, in particular to easily see which executable is responsible and, at a click, where it's located:

A difference in IO function

My laptop's touchpad in Zorin Core is very hard to use. I thought I'd have to search for a different distro, or else use a separate mouse.
The settings you see above for Core, at Mouse & Touchpad, are hardly improving it: at lower speed, you have to swipe a lot across the screen; at higher speed, you can't be precise over small areas.

From a bit of research, it might have to do with proper pointer acceleration settings and/or implementation.

In Lite OS (but also in just Xfce DE within Core OS), the touchpad works perfectly, like in Windows, and also have the respective settings for acceleration:


So, for me: Zorin Lite is the winner, at least so far.

What made you choose one way or the other?

3 Likes

Zorin lite has a lower resource consumption (my notebook ran faster and cooler with Zorin lite), it is much more flexible in the customization options, above all you don't need so many extensions that often no longer work after updates or lead to conflicts.

3 Likes

I don't like xfce. So, I used Core with Gnome. And I'm in the Position that my Hardware has enough Power for it.

2 Likes

do you mean extensions that are preinstalled with Core, or that you would need to install to match the abilities in Lite?
Any examples?

XFCE offers many functions by default that are blocked in Gnome and are only made possible by extensions. Some of them are already pre-installed in Zorin core, but you still need more extensions for better customization options.
E.g. custom actions in thunar - in files (nautilus) you need an extension
E.g. to install user themes you need an extension in gnome (which is preinstalled)

2 Likes