What I'm saying is not just my opinion I think that is objective fact that the start menu in the corner is faster and far easier to open.
Yes but touchpads and mice are basically the same thing. Same on screen controls. What I meant was touch interfaces like tablet/mobile screens... so that you directly hit it with your finger.
What I said is still applicable to touchpads. I believe that this is an objectively worse design.
While it is changeable... the issue is always the default option. Little Timmy or the old neighbor are not going to bother to change these settings. The majority of the users stick with the default option. And MS knows that... I don't think there is any foul play here but rather the MS designers are terrible at their jobs. They are pedaling something that they KNOW is worse and will hurt the users' productivity.
That's the key detail here. They know their design sucks so instead they want to shove it down everyone's throats and falsely claim it is better. For the lack of a better word, it is brainwashing the mass audience into using a worse product, while having the impression that it is better.
I would say a trackpad is a somewhere in-between mouse and touch screen. It is not the same as mouse. Especially the trackpad with multitouch functions.
Interesting thing was that my husband was a Power Mac (single button mouse) user and he never got the idea of second mouse button. I gave him a Kensington trackball and he has been very happy with it. He is also using a completely faceless (no alphabet printed on it) orthogonal keyboard with BEPO (French version of Dvorak) input system.
I believe the input system, i.e., tactile sensation is a very personal experience. That is why it is important to give users a choice. Only a user can tell what is the best for him/her-self.
This may be true... but there is always the windows key instead of mouse navigation, and keyboard navigation is much quicker. I use the win + x combo constantly rather than the start menu, which still seems uneededly cluttered. At least zorin opens to categories and is easy to find things.... cinnamon makes that even better, not needing too click on the category, just opens it on hover. Windows i never use the start menu... explorer, desktop shortcuts or win x.... anything else isn't worth the time.
It is open source and actively developed, a big advantage over now discontinued Temple OS. I have been following it and testing it out (on VM) time to time.
Ah, sorry, I did not realize we are deviating so much from the original subject.
It would be great if you can split the thread.
Apart from Linux I also play around other OSs such as macOS, RiscOS and freeBSD. I would love to hear the experience of other people on this forum.
I am happy to read about comparison between Temple OS and Zorin OS. We are already too busy helping other people here. I can save this Haiku OS question for the rainy day