If you search online you'll notice that it's always the same handful of articles being shared around, and always the same points that have all been addressed by Brave some time ago. At this point, I would really like to read some new material that doesn't try to appeal to the emotion.
What I find most irritating about those articles is how they criticize Brave for what Mozilla is now doing openly and at a much larger scale. It's simple: if it's wrong, then it's wrong when anybody does it. And if it's wrong anyway and the decision comes down to the lesser of two evils, then Brave wins without breaking a sweat.
Here you have Azorin's thoughts on this:
I would disagree also with using Mullvad Browser, but for a different reason.
Zorin OS aims to appeal to those who are looking for a way out of Windows, and who may not necessarily be particularly tech savvy nor interested in the utmost privacy.
Linux as a whole already has a (somewhat) deserved reputation of being difficult to learn. There really is no need to make the process any more painful than it needs to be, and using esoteric applications with strong privacy defaults is not going to help with that. Moving away from Windows already is a great step in that direction, and those who were already using things like Google or Facebook won't be gaining anything from using Mullvad Browser.
The choice remains there, but a gentle introduction is probably the best way to get people interested.