Will Zorin OS remain genAI-free?

About 6 months ago I moved from Windows to Linux, specifically Zorin, in order to avoid the genAI slop that was starting to become impossible to avoid in Windows.

(btw, GenAI is unethical, exploitative, inaccurate, bad for the environment and bad for your brain. You should not use it and certainly not trust it for anything that matters to you.)

Now, I'm seeing that the creator of Linux (LT) has caught the genAI virus and wants to use genAI in the Linux code, or something. And of course the first kernel (7.0.0) that comes with this philosophy has broken my computer. This makes me worried about Zorin OS. So my question is:
Will Zorin OS remain genAI free?
(as in, no genAI used in its creation and no forcing genAI software on its users)

If the answer to that is no - anyone has another Linux distribution to suggest that is as similar to Windows as possible (like Zorin OS) but with a clear pledge to avoid genAI?

Thanks for any help!

2 Likes

I would take a look at Q4OS which uses a lower kernel than Zorin, and has a cool third party LookSwitcher to bring you many differentvWindows theming out of the Box. It is a rolling release. The latest release is built on Debian 13. They also offer a lughtweight DE, Trinity, which is what KDE looked like prior to Plasma. Think Win2K styling.

You could also taje a look at other distributions that utilise Plasma, like PCLOS Debian, MX-Linux, and the Debian Edition of Linux Mint, as you can add Plasma via Synaptic Package Manager or via the terminal.
Other alternatives include Devuan, Artix or GhostBSD.

Coding with AI doesn't mean kernel will work with AI, don't mix up things

1 Like

I don't trust anything that's been coded by genAI.. and I also do not want to support a brand that supports genAI. It's a destructive industry and its values are completely misaligned with what I thought Linux's values were.

Thanks @swarfendor437 , that's a lot of suggestions! Which one would you say is the most similar to Windows (and Zorin), and the most easy to use out of the box? Would that be Q4OS?

Yep. Just a word of caution. Only Plasma 5.27 is able to use a Windows 10 themed menu fluidly when it comes to the Tiled Menu. This means looking at "Aquarius", old stable 5.9 which is good until June 2028. It does have a much lower kernel than Zorin which may be an issue, perhaps not.
The latest release is "Andromeda" or 6.7. I cannot get it to work with Ventoy, but burns and boots from DVD.
The Tiled Menu on Plasma 6.3.6 requires having the patience to move the tiles using x/y co-ordinates.

There is a new kid on the block as zren, the developer of Tiled Menu has not made any updates, even though he has released the version for Plasma 6. The different version is called Prime Tiled Menu (or perhaps Tiled Menu Prime) which I only got to work with Fedora 44 Workstation when I was playing around with it in a VM.

It is a pity that Q4OS no longer have 6.4 available to download from Sourceforge as thatvworked without issue on Ventoy.

Okay, we should seperate here Stuff.

Ubuntu will implement AI in the System beginning with Ubuntu 26.10. That will not have an Effect on Zorin because Zorin stays on Ubuntu 24.04. Wehn Ubuntu 28.04 will come, we have to see how the Zorin Dev's decide how they handle the AI Integration - for Example if they can remove it - and what Consequences they take. But these are future Decisions. There is no Answer for this now.

The Kernel-Thing: It is so: Torvalds isn't so stupid to think when he would not allow to use AI that the People would follow and don't bring AI Code. Also he seems to see it as a Tool (I wouldn't see it as this easy and wouldn't agree).

So, when a Programer uses AI to create Code (to make it common) it is per se not forbidden. But of course the Programer has the Resposibility and have to check what he/she gets from the AI. And it must be marked as far as I know. And of Course the brought in Code will be checked like with everything what is brought in.

And a Word to the recommended Distro's from @swarfendor437: They all use the Kernels from the Kernel Project. So, You are there on the same Level like here. It doesn't make a Difference.

6 Likes

I think a Direct Answer to your Direct Questions would help:

The ZorinGroup has openly and Publicly stated that they will not be including any A.I. into Zorin OS or as a Part of Zorin OS.
If End Users wish to install and use localized A.I., they are free to do so. Zorin OS will not come with any A.I. preinstalled.
This aligns with a pattern; they openly rejected Age Verification. They openly switched from Firefox due to the Firefox policy changes on user data.

The ZorinGroup is beholden to the powers that be as much as we are. If the Linux Kernel begins using A.I., then they and us must join forces to apply pressure to the powers that be.

Inheritance: Having Ubuntu as a base may mean Zorin OS can inherit A.I. written code used in making Ubuntu.
This is still largely unknown at this time, how far Canonical may go and how derivatives like Mint or Zorin OS's can avoid or even know what to examine.

Only the ZorinGroup: @AZorin and @zorink can elaborate on their concerns for the future on external influences to Zorin OS.

5 Likes

I was interested to see that Voyager has left Ubuntu behind and now using Debian. They recently ran a poll on A.I. in future releases:

Well I got the shift to Debian wrong!:

Sadly only available in three flavours:

snap
flatpak
full snap

Uggghhhh!

"We hope this satisfies you."

I... do not know about that wording. Let's see... Implement an idea that is known to be controversial. Get feedback. Run a poll. Poll results vote against.
Suggest hope that the users are satisfied.

I would not have worded that in that way!

3 Likes

I've been using AI to create several shell scripts in Termux for my own use cases because I couldn't find any apps on the Play Store that do what I need. So far, the scripts have been working well and are really useful for me.

I don't know how good AI coding was a year ago, but it's definitely much better now. I'm not entirely anti-AI when it comes to coding. AI is just a tool, it depends on how humans use it.

It is a tool. It is a very complex and expensive tool.

I think that the problem with A.I. is that complexity bleeds into answering the hard questions.

A hammer is a simple tool. It is not complex enough to bleed into areas that can be dangerous, damaging, exploited or abused in a way that A.I. can be and even has been.

From your perspective, you saw a page on a screen that belies the cost behind it. You used it simply and neatly and properly, so the nefarious results are far removed from your experience.

3 Likes

And from now on I will endeavour to be a Sustainable swarf' by only looking at non-A.I. search results.

2 Likes

A.I. can invent fictitious material. Called "hallucinations", it will print output of prompts, quotes or references that do not exist.
It can conflate two different materials together.
A.I. can give misleading responses that need to be fact checked and verified.
It follows its programming, producing output without considering its veracity as much as whether it matches the pattern of the topic.
It can just be plain, flat out Wrong.

All of which, Humans Do!

It may be that what frightens many people about A.I., is how much it resembles us.

3 Likes
1 Like

It really doesn't look as if Zorin will be pushing AI into everything like Microsoft and Google are doing. Both of those companies are hell bent on forcing their users into accepting and using AI for everything they do on their computers, but I'd guess that the vast majority of Linux users would completely reject this approach. I spent a while earlier using WinUtil to strip out all of the AI integrated into Windows 11. Yesterday's update tried to block the commands but I managed to get around it eventually. I need to keep using Windows for my job, at least for now, but, like you, I won't accept AI being stuffed into everything I need to do. I really do not see Zorin heading in that direction. There will be other OS that may offer more AI integration for those who want it. That is a choice for every user to make for themselves. That is the beauty of Linux: choice.

About it being used to write code, well, that is a whole other thing entirely. Many developers and maintainers have been using AI to write code, find and fix errors and create patches for a very long time. A Nvidia engineer (Sasha Levin), admitted at the Open Source Summit in 2025 that a patch he submitted for Linux 6.15 was entirely generated by an LLM, including the code and changelog, without initially disclosing it. This incident sparked the debate that led to the creation of formal rules, revealing that AI use had been occurring quietly as tools improved. Prior to April 2026, there wasn't a formal policy requiring developers to declare if they used AI. Consequently, AI-generated code was being submitted and merged without reviewers knowing its origin.

The change from hidden use to mandatory disclosure was driven by a crisis in May 2026, when the kernel's private security mailing list became "almost entirely unmanageable." Linus Torvalds reported that the list was flooded with duplicate, low-quality bug reports generated by researchers using the same AI tools. Because these submissions were previously unregulated and often lacked context, maintainers could not distinguish between serious findings and "AI slop," nor could they see that others had already reported the same issues many times!

In April, 2026 the Linux Project took a formal stance with Linux 7, and with updated reporting tools following in May.

  • Mandatory Disclosure: contributors must now use an Assisted-by tag to identify any AI tools used in creating a patch.
  • Human Liability: AI agents cannot sign the Signed-off-by tag; a human must take full legal and technical responsibility for the code.
  • Public Reporting: security bugs found via AI must now be reported publicly rather than on the private list, based on the logic that if AI found it, likely many others did too.

Linus Torvalds has emphasised that while AI use is now transparent, the project remains pragmatic: AI is accepted as a useful tool, but the "hide and seek" era of undisclosed AI contributions is over.
(Thanks to Tom's Hardware and It's FOSS for the facts).

It is impossible to avoid AI in every day life and important to understand that there are degrees to its use. Household waste management systems, waste water treatment plants, electricity supply grids, even logistics to stock supermarket shelves, so your local Walmart doesn't run out of bread... the list goes on and on. What we shouldn't do is use it frivolously, and we should take a stand when it is forced on us unnecessarily. This craze for data centers with greedy power consumption, the lack of regard for our planet and the climate change crisis it is driving... but AI is here to stay, we can't "un-bake the cake to get the eggs back".

I can't see Zorin_OS crammed full of AI gadgets but if that does happen, I'll be out of the door right behind you. Apparently, Ubuntu, Fedora, and Debian all permit AI use under human supervision. If you want to avoid any AI input you'll have to look at something like: Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre , which expressly rejects the use of AI. There are probably others out there if you search hard enough, but trying to ban AI from the kernel now is like trying to slam the lid shut on Pandora’s Box after the plagues have already flown out; it's too late.

8 Likes

Well just took another look at Sourceforge in respect of Voyager. Looks like they are doing both Ubuntu and Debian - wonder if this is akin to what Mint has done? Downloading now to test in a VM. Don't know if there is any A.I. in there or not.

I find it amusing that they say they will give the option to remove A.I. - what they forget to point out is that their Ubuntu derivative will have A.I. baked in, which is why I suspect they have had to make that bizarre statement in the poll result.

Well the Debian edition is not much better:

Honing in on the bottom right corner of the desktop:

I will look inside /usr/share/wallpapers to see if there is anything to add to the cloud collection I have shared before. What is interesting, the wallpapers are not accessible from the desktop. Gnome now has a bizarre setting. When you select change Desktop settings (I was thinking like Plasma) it would offer change wallpaper. What does it do? it puts all the folders in /home on the right side of the desktop. How bizarre is that! So basically, Voyager has gone downhill fast - they've been using too much Gnome and A.I. skateboards!

2 Likes

You really hit on something here.
And like @geniux97 pointed out, it is a tool. People will use it.
I am bold enough to delve into the hard questions. Is it "just" a tool?

What are the costs? What are the risks?
A.i. in its current state is unprecedented technology.
We cannot meaningfully compare it to the automotive revolution. Nor the industrial revolution. Here is why:
Each of these, while they have some severe consequences, afforded retraining potential.
When the car replaced the horse and buggy, carriage makers could retrain in automotive. I can list many examples, but for brevity, you get the idea.

A.I. is different.
It can take a job. It can then analyze other jobs, refine and improve those, and take those too. Retrain as an A.I. Coding engineer? A.I. can do that, too.
Given progress for A.I., it can spread like a virus. The only remaining human employment being manual labor.
Keeping up the physical machines the A.I. needs. This is not a doom prophecy - it is real and valid long term potential.

And there are the costs:
Massive data centers that are granted with imminent domain, taking homes. Huge industrial cooling, with high water demand. Climate affecting leaps in energy usage. And we can ill afford more climate inducing actiivty.

I do not hate A.I. I do not fear A.I.
I am... more than anything else... disturbed by humanity.
That we are willing to do this - to ourselves.
To make things easy, on this day - and worry about tomorrow... tomorrow.

Today, A.I. is a novelty. It can help.
It can be very helpful, even...
Any one of us, logging in to ChatGPT, is not a villain. Is not a person who lacks care.
But, long term... humans survived by accepting ease over effort. It has cost us in small ways, ever time.
Obesity. Vision and dental. Major health concerns - all that arise from our modern lifestyle. The facts.

We are just trying to make it in a society where it is sink or swim.
And A.I. will smile. And give words. But...

It is not our friend.

So, to possibly Bezos and to OpenAI and Nvidia, they espouse that they hope that A.I. advancement will lead to solving these real world problems.
There is no evidence that it can or that it will. Just... an ephemeral hope. And that is not enough to justify the cost or the risk.
That is just flying blind and hoping you land in Hawaii instead of the top of Mt Everest.

8 Likes

Well not many new wallpapers in Voyager Debian. What is interesting is that Gnome now don't offer you the chance to get to / - seasoned users would know to change /home/user in Files to just / to get to the root file system.

Not many new wallpapers so ignored the new ones. The worse one, on a pale blue/turquoise wall says "AI" - wonder if they used A.I. to generate that one! :rofl:

It also kept crashing. Bizarrely it offers a Calamares installer! They only positive I could find is that they include Tweaks by default, it is not something that has to be added to later.

So it's farewell from him, and au revoir from me.

Great post, thank you Aravisian.
I write code (custom website back-ends, lots of database work, etc). I still do this myself, manually. I know every line of my code, keeping the map of it in my head. I know exactly which module to look in to solve issues.

I have avoided the use of any AI tools, painfully aware that all my contemporaries are using these tools to obtain results faster than I can. But I am aware of the hidden costs - the resources (water, electricity, RAM, etc) being stuffed into data-centres; the vast amount of stolen* data it has been fed on (Github, eg).

I don't use any AI-generated search results because, in the areas I am knowledgable in, while they can be accurate they are not reliably so. I have seen lots of examples of AI search happily returning completely erroneous results - usually a conflation from several sources, often returning code that does the exact opposite. Thus I cannot trust it with any search outwith my knowledge area.

However, I accept that it can be a valid tool. I would prefer that it only be used by those who still have the knowledge to oversee and quality-check its results. My concern is that we are passing that boundary already. And I am unhappy with its use everywhere without consideration of the ethicaal costs. (For me, the water, power and hardware usage is also an ethical matter).

*depends how you define it, I suppose, and who is doing the data-trawl.

5 Likes